
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BRI eLearning | Scott Harris | Activity</title>
	<link>https://elearning.billofrightsinstitute.org/members/oldthink/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://elearning.billofrightsinstitute.org/members/oldthink/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Scott Harris.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 02:51:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=9.1.1</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b88af3f88ea021282b459b0add62413e</guid>
				<title>Scott Harris replied to the topic TLR - C1 - Final Discussion 1 [ID 6764] in the forum TLR &#124; Course 1 &#124; Dialogue, Logic and Reasoning, and Civic Life</title>
				<link>https://elearning.billofrightsinstitute.org/forums/Prompt/tlr-c1-final-discussion-1-6764/#post-9285</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2022 01:57:32 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with debaters, in my experience, is that when they face opposing ideas in a Socratic Seminar they often try to &#8220;kill it with fire!&#8221; A Socratic seminar is focused more on the ideas of dialogue than victory, knowing that the word argue comes from the Latin, meaning &#8220;to polish.&#8221; This is the point of civil dialogue &#8212; that we will polish&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1255"><a href="https://elearning.billofrightsinstitute.org/forums/Prompt/tlr-c1-final-discussion-1-6764/#post-9285" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>